Back to HeavenGames Welcome to Stronghold Heaven
Welcome
Downloads Home
Review Guidelines
Main site
Forums
Code of Conduct
Search

Advanced Search
Stronghold Crusader: Skirmishes
Home
New Releases
New Reviews
New Comments
Top-Rated

Submit File
Browse Categories
New Files


Download File Post Review Post Comment

Honourable nemesis

Author File Description
Staisy15
File Details
Map Size: 300x300 (Medium)
Number of Players: 3
Balance: Balanced
Difficulty: Normal
Minimap:
This map is made for 3 players. You can play this map 2 vs 1 or 1 vs 1 vs 1. The stone, iron, the grass is enough for everyone and the space will be good if you will build not so huge castles.
The batle will be in the mountains and will just feel it's pressure, because you are down hill and your enemy is going to attack you from the hill. So build a good defense and destroy your nemesis! Good luck with that=)
Pages: « First « 1 [2] 3 » Last »
AuthorComments & Reviews   ( All | Comments Only | Reviews Only )
Staisy15
File Author
Oh one more thing, if you want me to ruin your maps, just write me a message and I will do it!
lord vader1 even tho i am new i say this is getting out of hand . just like the other two commentors said.. reviews are on map detail and effort . not favorites and you dont just go ruin some1 elses map if they give u a low mark
surajsubba Quote from staisy15-"Sir Ravenclaw why have you ruined my nice rating with such a low mark, I'm not rating your maps, because if I did, the raiting would be so low, that you would have to get thee 5 to make it atleast over 4."

-------------------------------------------------------------

Just because some reviews have enough category description doesn't necessarily make it accurate. As far as i see it there are still some favoritism here.

Sir Ravenclaw's review is absolutely fine and i dont see any reasons for such comments. I quite agree with Lord Karpathea and Sir Ravenclaw here. The map is nice. The main reason why "the reviews are low" is because the map though nice is not perfect. The design although was great, Ai capability was somewhat ignored. Many players here choose to play with/against several ai characters. The AI's that had larger version of castle(for instance Wolf,Nizar), did finish their fortifications;that didn't leave much room for plancing farms. Story is average. Try reading some fantasy novels,fictions etc.

Pls do not be offended. These are honest reviews and opinions from a downloaders point of view and not a mapmaker. Although some reviews may not be impeccable, they are given on the grounds of sound judgement and honesty.

Other reviews here seriously need to be revised.They are dubious and such reviews and comments can be highly reprehensible.Reviews given on the grounds on favoritism subsides the standards here. You are definitely one of the best new map makers here but pls do not show open hostility or amnity. This site does not tolerate dubious as well as revenge reviews.

*We need new members' full cooperation on this*

Please
Cheers!

[Edited on 02/27/07 @ 02:08 PM]

Staisy15
File Author
I want to speak honest too, but if i will speak honest about some maps, the autor will be mad and disappointed and I don't want that person to feel just like me. And when you say surajsubba "is because the map though nice is not perfect".Well I think that "nice" is about 4 not 3, because some maps are rated about 3.2 stars(the same as my rating), but those maps are much worse then mine and there rated the same. Naw is that fair??!

[Edited on 02/27/07 @ 02:22 PM]

Sir Ravenclaw Grow up, if you re-read my review you would see why I gave those scores.
Go ahead and write 'Revenge reviews' for my maps, they would be indecent and wouldn't stand for anything.

I wrote a fair review that took me some time to write, a good half hour - compared to the others that seem like 10 minutes, maybe less time to make.

I don't have anything agaisnt you, you seem like a very nice girl. Accept it, you can't always expect 4.8 ratings.

I just read your last comment staisy, you can state your own opinion and 'fix' the scores to what you think fair in a review.

[Edited on 02/27/07 @ 02:30 PM]

Staisy15
File Author
Well then why couldent you make it at least a 4 star, that all. Because 3.2 I think is to less for this map.
Lord Karpathea According to review guildlines, a 3 is average. Any thing greater (3.1 and up) is considered above average. A 4 is excellent. Any thing above (4.1 and up) is above excellent. So a 3.2 means above average.

If you decide to give people bad marks on their maps as retaliation, you will quickly find yourself banned.

[Edited on 02/27/07 @ 02:51 PM]

Staisy15
File Author
Why can't you two be pleasant like everybody?
lord vader1 staisy people put thier own rating on how THEY liked it not how you want it ( wasnt trying to be mean)
Sir Ravenclaw We are pleasant Staisy, we just don't agree with the favortism around here and we try to fix what scores are based around it.
If you look at the overall rating, that is fair - a 4.8, or a 3.2 isn't. I only posted my review to make a fair overall score.
Pages: « First « 1 [2] 3 » Last »

Post Review Post Comment

HGDL v0.8.0

Login
Forum Username:


Password:




Create a new account
Forgot password?
Rating
3.2
Breakdown
Playability4.0
Balance4.0
Creativity3.0
Map Design3.0
Story/Instructions2.0
Statistics
Downloads:662
Favorites: [Who?]0
Size:374.42 KB
Added:02/21/07