barbarius |
Posted on 06/04/08 @ 01:26 PM
On this siege, I played as the defender and as the striker.
Playability: 3
It's a very short siege. We control a very small castle against a small attack, and we don't have a lot of things to do, jsut to move the crossbows and the archers. It's very easy to kill the enemies, only the swordsmen can make a hope in the walls. After that, they were quickly killed in the castle by all my crossbow. So, the game isn't very exciting, because we don't have a lot of things to do. It's the same thing when we attack the castle. I've used 30 knights, making an attack without any strategy, and I can easily kill the enemy Lord.
Balance: 3
It's not really difficult. Almost anything to do, just to put the soldiers at the good place, and they can kill all the enemies. Shall I suggest you to choose for a strong attack or a strong defense ? In the first case, you probably have to get better the defense of the siege. In the second case, if the Player is the striker, he probably needs to use some strategy in order to win.
Creativity: 3
It's a poor castle, quite original... I might compare it to "Windsor 1070", because this castle is also a "wood castle", but more interesting, especially about the playability. Here, I can't say it's a map very original, but it's a wood castle, so it's original...
Map Design: 3
Not very beautiful... There's some hills, but, globally, it's not beautiful. Well, it's not ugly, but it's poor. The design of the castle is poor, and the map itself is poor. Nevertheless, the design is acceptable...
Story/Instructions: 2
Few tips given in the .txt file with the .zip, but there isn't a lot of things here. Quite disappointing too.
Additional Comments:
Maybe need some more work ! |